Register Login

Validation

Field Study Compares OSA With CSA for Measuring Efanesoctocog Alfa

Here is an open-access article contrasting the validity of OSA versus CSA for measuring efanesoctocog alfa (Altuviiio®) spiked into normal plasma: Pipe S, Sadeghi-Khomami A, Konkle BA, et al. A global comparative field study to evaluate the factor VIII activity of efanesoctocog alfa by one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assays at clinical haemostasis laboratories. Haemophilia. […]
read more

October 2025 QQ: Reporting Assay Uncertainty Data

Please refer to our August 29, 2025 discussion, “Hemostasis Assay Statistical Variation.” In this post, we linked the article, Mullier F, Gouin-Thibault I, Meijer P, et al. Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays. Res Practice Thromb Hemost 2025: 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102993. The authors contend that we should report uncertainty […]
read more

Poster: Monitoring FVIII in Hemophilia Patients Treated with Bypassing Therapeutics

To review the PBI poster presented at the 2025 ISTH meeting, click Effect of Mim8 and Emicizumab on Factor VIII Recovery by a Novel, Bovine Chromogenic FVIII Assay. Tara Quinton, Meghan Bruhm, Karen M. Black, Ali Sadeghi-Khomami. Precision BioLogic Inc., Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada. The poster illustrates the validity of bovine reagent-based chromogenic substrate FVIII […]
read more

Hemostasis Assay Statistical Variability

Here is an open-access commentary that addresses concerns about hemostasis assay statistical variability as it relates to clinical significance. Click: Mullier F, Gouin-Thibault I, Meijer P, et al. Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays. Res Practice Thromb Hemost 2025: 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102993. For a two-part discussion about hemostasis quality assurance […]
read more